On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:45:48 -0800 Mike Bird <mgb-trinity@...> wrote: > On Mon February 13 2012 10:30:30 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > so let's set the record straight, once again: we do care for our > > existing users, then and now. > > The evidence, Aaron, is the early KDE 4.n releases. They > were horrible in EVERY way and they were pushed down users > throats. *Some distributors* pushed KDE 4.few down users' throats. RHEL 5 and its clones use KDE 3.5.4, and are still supported. Debian made no stable release with KDE4 versions prior than 4.4, and 3.5.9-containing Lenny was supported until last month. Slackware stills provides some security patches for Slackware 8.1, which is old enough to have been released KDE 3.0. > > Recent KDE 4.n are incremental improvements but KDE 4 is a > different product than KDE 3.5. It is aimed at different > users who work in different ways. I actually don't know > anyone who claims to be productive in KDE 4 but I believe > reports that such users exist. Count me on them, I feel like I'm more productive with KDE4 than everything else (but not by a wide margin compared to KDE3/Trinity). I'm happy as long as I have the very extensive support KDE has for keyboard shortcuts. > > You've lost the KDE 3.5 users. Go enjoy your new users. > Go enjoy your life. We are very much enjoying TDE. > > --Mike Bird > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... For additional > commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@... Read > list messages on the web archive: > http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to > top-post: > http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >