Guys, Working with the current tarballs compared with those created from the git tree I have run into a difference in path information included in the existing tarballs instead of those created from a local copy of the git tree. The existing tarballs referenced in the PKGBUILD scripts contain the dependencies path information i.e.: dependencies/tqtinterface/ dependencies/tqtinterface/TODO dependencies/tqtinterface/ConfigureChecks.cmake dependencies/tqtinterface/COPYING dependencies/tqtinterface/CMakeLists.txt dependencies/tqtinterface/configure.in.mid dependencies/tqtinterface/qtinterface/ dependencies/tqtinterface/qtinterface/tqlcdnum.h dependencies/tqtinterface/qtinterface/parser2.sh While those I create from the git tree simply contain e.g.: tqtinterface/CMakeLists.txt tqtinterface/configure.in.bot tqtinterface/AUTHORS tqtinterface/admin/ tqtinterface/configure.in.mid Is prefixing the files in the tarball with the entire directory path below 'main/' going to be the standard? In the past, I have always excluded the module prefix (applications, common, dependencies, libraries, ...). Either way will work, but from a PKGBUILD standpoint, we need to make sure there is a standard. What is the consensus? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.