trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: February 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Any reason NOT to use libjpeg-turbo instead of libjpeg?

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:12:16 -0600
> On Tuesday 21 February 2012 04:51:26 pm Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> >> On 02/21/2012 02:49 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> >> > The only reason I haven't compiled into Ubuntu<  Oneiric is that it
>> is
>> >> > only available as a package in Oneiric and up.
>> >
>> > As long as it doesn't introduce any issues, and as long as it can
>> coexist
>> > with normal libjpeg, why not compile a version for TDE just for the
>> > distros/versions that don't already have it?
>> >
>>
>> It seems to require multilib, and I don't want to get into repackaging
>> it
>> (due to my perpetual lack of time).
>
> I meant starting with R14 :-)
>
> I've never heard of something requiring multilib, nor should it if it's
> build on x86, since anything compiled on there is basically "monolib"
> anyway.

The way they did the libturbo packages ensures that they won't build on
anything less than oneiric.  All I know is that it relies on the
/usr/lib-<archname>/ structure.

Tim