On Saturday 25 February 2012 18:06:00 Darrell Anderson wrote: > > GHNS is cool. > > I was thinking however, since scripts are small > > in size, we could just at them as defaults. It doesn't > > seem to be much overhead. > > > > What do you guys think of that? > > As I mentioned in a previous post, perhaps we vote and select a half dozen > or dozen scripts to include in the default packaging. The default is the > scripts are disabled but appear in the Settings configurations for the new > user. this would be ok, IMHO. > The remainder of any scripts we want to support could be available at > the wiki. well, that was the point where I think GHNS makes much more sense. I don't think normal users would regularly search a wiki for addons for individual applications. > This discussion now raises another point. If Trinity supports a Get Hot New > Stuff option, should we check through all of the sources and update the URL > to a Trinity location? agreed - this way would also prevent to point to outdated/inexistent locations, or those which are intended for kde4 only (thus incompatible with trinity). Werner