On 11 March 2012 17:04, Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...> wrote: >> Is this a nice little patch so interesting that I should >> incorporate it into prepared updates for 3.5.13? > > I don't see any reason the patch can't be back ported to 3.5.13. The patch is only two lines. > > Darrell > > And my patch was written based on 3.5.13 sources. Calvin