Message: previous - next
Month: April 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Qt:: or TQt:: ?

From: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@...>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:19:05 +0200
Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> Second, what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather
>> than TQt::?
> None really--it's a readability issue only.

Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using
TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding
patches and so on)?