On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Julius Schwartzenberg
<julius.schwartzenberg@...> wrote:
> Timothy Pearson wrote:
>>> Second, what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather
>>> than TQt::?
>>
>> None really--it's a readability issue only.
>
> Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using
> TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding
> patches and so on)?

Agree. No reason for extra TQt spreading.