Message: previous - next
Month: April 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Qt:: or TQt:: ?

From: Aleksey Midenkov <midenok@...>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:02:49 +0400
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Julius Schwartzenberg
<julius.schwartzenberg@...> wrote:
> Timothy Pearson wrote:
>>> Second, what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather
>>> than TQt::?
>> None really--it's a readability issue only.
> Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using
> TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding
> patches and so on)?

Agree. No reason for extra TQt spreading.