> Hi
>
> In the user-list, I announced the state of preparation updates for 3.5.13:
> http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3008
>
> I also strongly modify the article in Etherpad. Now there is also a
> current listing of included patches. This will be easier for me to keep
> it up to date... and perhaps even easier for you:
> http://trinity.etherpad.trinitydesktop.org/16
>
> I would like to discuss with you whether further delay the official
> release updates? I intended to add to updates all packages for which were
> following patches:
>
> - Remove additional unneeded tq method conversions
> - Rename obsolete tq methods to standard names
> - Rename a few stragglers
> - Fix inadvertent "TQ" changes
>
> For some packages, already contained in the update, these patches solve
> tricky problems. But these patches applies to almost all the remaining
> packages. Therefore, I ask if I should go into it (will take some time to
> process it), or ask Tim whether to issue updates as they are ready now?
>
> Personally, I tend to do - to release as soon as possible. Updates already
> solves many errors. And that's why I find it useful to release as soon as
> possible. What is your opinion?
>
> I attach link to archive containing the current set of patches (5.4 MiB).
> Maybe useful for others who prepare packages for other distributions.
>
> http://www.axis.cz/linux/trinity-3.5.13-udpate-patches-1.tgz
>
> Slávek

Are you referring to a potential 3.5.13.1 source tarball release?  If so,
yes, it might be a good idea to release such a point update soon.

It would make everything easier for me to do that if a full patch file
could be provided that would apply cleanly to the extracted TDE sources
from the complete 3.5.13 tarball--this would avoid having to republish the
3.5.13 tarballs, which would add several gigabytes of files to the already
strained mirror system.

Tim