> On 05/02/2012 08:13 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: >> That said, I hope you find something soon and that this is NOT a gcc >> related issue! > > Grumble, grumble, grumble -- Uh, Boss... I've got bad news... > > -- > David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Before I chase a wild goose, any chance you can verify with a rebuild of the latest GIT head on gcc 4.6? Tim