Message: previous - next
Month: May 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Why is HAL a bad word?

From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@...>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 09:07:26 -0500
On 05/07/2012 08:27 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
> Given the reasons it's now an orphan, I don't think it's wise for us to assume its
> maintenance (IIRC, Tim has already said he doesn't want to, anyway).  Best to
> move on.

Yep, I agree totally. The big question is my mind is (1) time & (2) manpower 
constraints to implement its removal from tde. Every kde3 project that wants 
to move forward must be addressing this issue. While it might seem 
unmanageable for TDE to do it alone, or SuSE to do it alone, or whoever to do 
it alone, if we could somehow coordinate TDE, SuSE and whoever else (need to 
ID these) so that a common framework is chosen and the parts of the transition 
broken down into block 1, 2, 3, .... so that TDE does 1, suse does 2, and so 
on -- it starts to look a whole lot more doable.

Why not have a central halfreetkde3-wiki or something similar that could host 
removal standards and server as a patch repository/hub....

Instead of having 10 different projects separately trying to do the same thing 
10 different ways, it is far better to have 10 different projects contribute 
to doing 1 thing the same way....

David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.