Message: previous - next
Month: May 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Why is HAL a bad word?

From: Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:09:49 -0400
On 05/09/2012 09:37 AM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> the proyect wash too much time in unusefully thinks like "Greater
> stability, more features"

Greater stability and more features are "un-useful things?" I find them 
to be exactly what I am looking for in a desktop environment.

>  "Monitor and Display gui settings" (that linux real user modifiy at
> xorg settings in console),

I don't think any sane person with a normal setup has been manually 
editing their Xorg.conf's in several years... any commercial desktop in 
the last 10 years has had a GUI display config. it's great!

> I think the first thing you should do was to begin *ONLY* with the migration
> to cmake, make a stimated finish, and once the main parts was migrated,
> start repairing most important faults .. the result will be more focused to
> expected..

luckily cmake development can go along _meanwhile_ other problems are 
resolved. I mean look at how many bug reports and problems have been 
resolved since 3.5.10 alone.

I don't really see what you are getting at.