Message: previous - next
Month: June 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] digikam FTBFS - libpng15 patch regression or not applied?

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:49:19 -0500
>> > (I'm confused why the preprocessor checks were not needed.)
>> They are not needed because the original code in Digikam was
>> redundant. The patch simply removed the redundancy!
> Ok. You're dealing with a C++ dunce here, remember? I still don't grasp
> pointers, ->, this, and other C++ related weirdness.
> Because both David and I built digikam against libpng 1.5 and 1.4.9
> respectively, with the preprocessor check patch, apparently the checks did
> not cause any harm but are unnecessary.
> I guess nice try but I'm still a C++ dunce. :-)
> Darrell

No problem. :-)  I appreciate all the work you have been putting in on
this project; even if you don't fully grasp C/C++, you are still providing
valuable services that the project needs.