> On Tuesday 25 January 2011 21:59:10 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>
>> I am excepting Qt here.  My original intent was to kick out software
>> that
>> relies on ancient, special purpose libraries that cannot feasibly be
>> "resurrected" and maintained.  For example, anything using deprecated
>> and
>> removed kernel calls, etc.
>
> If they used removed calls they would not build.
>
> By the way, how do you solve the problem of hal removal? I think we will
> be in
> necessity to add hal to our KDE3 repo once hal is removed from tha base
> system.

I'm working on a replacement using udev/upower.  It's a ways off though.

Tim