trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: August 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Tim: TDEHWLIB

From: Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
> 2. HAL.... Darrell you said you think people are leaving
> trinity because of HAL? Users do not give a flying fark about HAL or
> what it is. I suspect few of them understand or even have knowledge
> of it's existance. What is imperative is that no matter what backend
> is used, the functionality is the same and the transistion is
> seamless.

I did not write or imply any such comment. I wrote that I don't envision anybody using Trinity when automounting is broken, which is now the case on any HAL-less system.

Darrell