> On Saturday 01 of September 2012 04:15:53 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> I should mention that I am not opposed to renaming the classes, I am
>> just
>> wondering if there might be a better name that won't conflict with a
>> different project.
>
> I believe that it is useful consensus to use name QtCurve because also
> gtk2-engines-qtcurve refer to the same name QtCurve. Without having had
> anything to do with QT3 / QT4 / KDE. And in same manner also our
> tde-style-qtcurve refer to the same style name QtCurve.
>
> Renaming TQtCurve* classes to QtCurve* is a simplification of a technical
> problem with the automatic renaming TQt=>Qt during build along with Qt3.
>
> Slavek
> --

OK, works for me with the justification given above.  Rename away. :-)

Tim