trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: February 2014

Re: [trinity-devel] Alternative release version numbering scheme proposal

From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@...>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:24:51 -0600
On 02/12/2014 11:21 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>   package-major.minor.micro-rel.arch.(compression
> 
> http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Software-Release-Practice-HOWTO/#naming
> 
>  package-major.minor[.micro]-qualifier.arch.(compression)
> 
> Good example: https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
> 
> Any reference to time is meaningless. See
> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/77637/yyyy-mm-dd-hhmm-vs-major-minor-revision,
> comment 12:
> 
>  [YYYY].[MM].[DD].[hh][mm] has no meaning. It's just a coincidental binding
> between a moment in time and a release

Another good page for consideration:

http://semver.org/

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.