> On Sunday 13 November 2011 03:08:26 Keith Daniels wrote: > >> If Trinity is as bad as you claim (and not just in spite just because >> your pet project seems to be being neglected lately) why did >> DistroWatch give Trinity Desktop money? > > This may explain why Pearson is so paranoid. I did not even want to grace this comment with a reply, but you are insinuating such a high level of unprofessional conduct that I must defend myself in some fashion. You are completely incorrect. Perhaps you think this is how FOSS projects should be run, I really have no idea. Just be aware that the TDE project has been operating at a *net loss* ever since its inception. It exists purely because I (and many others) believe the KDE3 codebase should not have been thrown aside so carelessly many years ago, and I continue to believe that its interface has relevance today. Any other motives are baseless speculation on your part, and your insinuations amount to a personal attack on my integrity. You do yourself more harm than I. Timothy Pearson Trinity Desktop Porject