trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: February 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] Is Tree View Broken?

From: Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:02:40 -0800 (PST)
> It very well might.  I am only building with tqt3, and  I know there are
> some problems under qt3.  It might be a good idea to make a list...

Why do we continue supporting qt3? Why not move qt3 to the pasture? That way everybody builds only with tqt3 and everybody stays on the same page. If you want to keep qt3 for historical reasons, possibly move qt3 out of the main tree so people don't use that version any more.

Would save time on the list too because everybody is building from the same base. If you only patch tqt3 then you save time for yourself too.

For example, building tdebindings won't build against qt3 and you have stated you won't pursue that. Yesterday I conjured up some patches. I finally can build tdebindings against tqt3 except for xparts (and qtsharp --- I don't have a C# compiler installed).

As you can see from my previous post, tree view is fine with the tqt3 set I built yesterday.

For myself I will stick with tqt3 from now on.

Darrell