On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 21:58, Kristopher Gamrat <pikidalto@...> wrote:
> 2011/1/7 Ilya Chernykh <neptunia@...>
>>
>> Also true. Still, I find it that the whole departure to Dolphin in KDE4
>> was far from ideal still. Profile handling well would be better.
>>
>>
>> No doubt. Dolphin is completely unusable. There are just some errors in
>> profile handling scripts which should be fixed. Also I noticed that many
>> errors  were introduced in KDE3 in final versions such as 3.5.10 while were
>> absent previously. Seems like a marketing move to justify scrapping it.
>>
> What errors are these errors? I haven't used Dolphin extensively, but in the
> few times I did use it I did not notice any problems.
>
>

Sorry, I'm going to give in to the KDE 4.6 RC.
Dolphin seems to be working much better. (I actually got impressed,
which is... amazing.)
Konqueror, on the other hand, is still a piece of crap. (why don't
they just make rekonq the default and kill konqueror...)

Truthfully, I'm using Dolphin for KDE3 (D3olphin, I think it's called)
because Konqueror is making me pull hair.
but I'm wondering if maybe there could be a ReKonq for kde3? lol.
Either that, or we'll wait for tQT to mature for Qt4.


-- 
later, Robert Xu