> Been a long time since we discussed gcc hidden visibility for symbols. > Last I remember, this was supported in (T)Qt3, arts, tdelibs, and tdebase. > > I tried building my normal package suite with this option enabled in every > package. Some packages built but ignored the configure option. Some failed > to build. Some built and there were no messages at all about the option. > > Removing the option from the failure group allowed the packages to build. > > For the latter group, as no errors or build failures occurred, I presume > the option is supported. > > Still, is this a good idea? I read a bit about the topic and the > information is way over my head. The only thing I do understand is using > the option is supposed to reduce libary size and improve loading speeds. > > Darrell Yes, hidden symbols are a good thing and are enabled by default .on the Debian/Ubuntu builds. I am somewhat surprised that you have encountered build failures; which modules failed to build? Tim