Le 22/10/2012 21:30, Slávek Banko a écrit :
> On Monday 22 of October 2012 21:19:40 Darrell Anderson wrote:
>>> With commit e5a2da23 showed few duplicate locolor icons:
>>>
>>> tdeartwork-theme-icon-trinity:
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/Locolor/16x16/apps/kbabel.png
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/Locolor/16x16/apps/ktimemon.png
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/Locolor/32x32/apps/kbabel.png
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/Locolor/32x32/apps/ktimemon.png
>>>
>>> kicker-applets-trinity:
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps/ktimemon.png
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps/ktimemon.png
>>>
>>> kbabel-trinity:
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps/kbabel.png
>>>
>>> opt/trinity/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps/kbabel.png
>>>
>>> I have a very simple question is: From which package exclude
>>> their installation? I'd recommend installing with the tdeartwork
>>> and exclude from tdeaddons and tdesdk. What is your opinion?
>> I show the following in my package sets:
>>
>> kbabel.png:
>> tdeartwork, tdesdk
>>
>> ktimemon.png:
>> tdeartwork, tdeaddons
>>
>> Darrell
>>
> Yes, we have the same files - Debian binary packages are more granulary. I
> will update the installation, to be installed in only one of these packages.
> The question is, from which package?
>
> a) All from tdearwork
> b) From tdeaddons and tdesdk
> c) None of the above =>  another interesting idea :)
>
> Slavek

I think the locolor icons should go with the package that provides the 
"index" for the locolor theme.
Without the index installed, the icons are useless.
I believe the package providing locolor index is tdeartwork.

Francois