trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: October 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] A few duplicate locolor icons

From: Slávek Banko <slavek.banko@...>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:15:00 +0200
Dne Monday 22 of October 2012 21:41:45 jste napsal(a):
> On Monday 22 of October 2012 21:36:31 Francois Andriot wrote:
> > >> I show the following in my package sets:
> > >>
> > >> kbabel.png:
> > >> tdeartwork, tdesdk
> > >>
> > >> ktimemon.png:
> > >> tdeartwork, tdeaddons
> > >>
> > >> Darrell
> > >
> > > Yes, we have the same files - Debian binary packages are more
> > > granulary. I will update the installation, to be installed in only one
> > > of these packages. The question is, from which package?
> > >
> > > a) All from tdearwork
> > > b) From tdeaddons and tdesdk
> > > c) None of the above =>  another interesting idea :)
> > >
> > > Slavek
> >
> > I think the locolor icons should go with the package that provides the
> > "index" for the locolor theme.
> > Without the index installed, the icons are useless.
> > I believe the package providing locolor index is tdeartwork.
> >
> > Francois
>
> François, absolutely perfect note!
> The decision was made :)
>
> Thank you.
>
> Slavek

It's a little complicated. Icons are installed in the standard way (automake 
as well as cmake) == automatically installs all variants of the icon that are 
available. It appears that there are three possible solutions:

1) Remove locolor icon.
2) Rename icon or move to a subfolder.
3) Skip icon during packaging in individual distributions.

Any other ideas?
Which solution seems preferable?

Slavek
--