Let me further explain.

example: krita-trinity-2012-06-12-a2c24b62-i686.rpm.xz 

has: name of package, trinity, date and git hash


On 14 November 2012 14:00, Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...> wrote:
> For git names just do the date it was built. Not as precise but easier to understand

A challenge with using the date is GIT is a moving target. Any version method used represents a snapshot moment of the repository. The GIT shortlog version better represents that snapshot moment than a date. A person could update a local repository but build a package set a week later. In that case the date would be incorrect.

If there was a way to pull a date from within the sources then a date could provide a better snapshot representation of the sources. But all Trinity packagers would need to use the same mechanism to pull the date to be consistent with one another.

Darrell


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@...
Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting