>This is not a palatable solution. As mentioned, searching the web 
>reveals that including demangle.h in binutils is not something 
>that can be presumed. Although some distros have been patched, not 
all 
>have been patched. Trinity has to build against stock distros and 
>not kludges.
>
>I've emailed the Slackware maintainer but there is no guarantee a 
>patched binutils is forthcoming.
>
>Can the original commit be rewritten to not use demangle.h? 
>Otherwise the only solution is reversing the original commit. I 
>believe that code was committed primarily as a troubleshooting aid 
>
>against bug report 1288. Therefore reversing the patch should not 
>cause any problems, but do we want to keep that code in GIT 
>permanently, even after bug report 1288 is resolved?

That commit is the only place in the entire GIT sources requiring a 
dependency on demangle.h. The only place the include is required is 
tdebase/kdesktop/lock/backtrace_symbols.c.

Darrell