Hello,

as pointed out by Fran�ois in bug report 1588, upower was previously named 
devicekit-power. And with corresponding dbus paths.

I wonder what is the cost of dbus call? I hesitate to support devicekit-power 
as an second dbus paths for upower or as a standalone backend.

What is your opinion?

http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1588

Thanks,
Slavek