On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:48:37 -0500 "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...> wrote: >>>>> Should the kstyle directories and files be changed to >tdestyle? >>>>> >>>>Probably. How much would that break at this point though >>>>configuration wise? >>> >>>I don't know. I'm not complaining. :-) I only noticed the >>>differences when I was responding to bug report 1609. Seems we >>>have >>>moved far with so much renaming and of late we have continued >some >>> >>>mopping up of those efforts. :-) >>> >>>A quick scan of modules that install files to >>>$PREFIX/share/apps/kstyle: >>> >>>tdelibs >>>tdebase >>>tdeartwork >>>tdesdk >>> >>>I don't have all packages installed right now so there might be >a >>>few more. >>> >>>Other loose ends include renaming $TDEHOME/share/apps/kstyle- >>>>tdestyle, where ever that is defined (tdelibs?), and r14-xdg- >>>update. Probably other loose ends too. >>> >>>I notice when grepping the sources some internal functions of >>>kstyle* still exist. tdebase/kpersonalizer has cpp files with >>>kstyle8. >>> >>>I could hammer out and test the patches. The grunt work of the >>>patches should go fine, but I'd need a some days of validating >>>build runs and usability testing. If I get overwhelmed I holler. >>>Probably first scream and cry, but eventually holler. :-) >> >> Creating patches went surprisingly smooth. The final list is >short: >> >> tdelibs >> tdebase >> tdeartwork >> tdesdk >> tde-style-lipstik >> tde-style-qtcurve >> koffice >> tde-i18n >> >> I had no build errors. A superficial test of selecting the >styles >> in kcontrol resulted in no errors or problems. >> >> Caveat: The tde-i18n patch is huge. So huge that I will not even >> try to post the patch or try to push to git until I reduce to >> smaller patches and push piece-meal one at a time. >> >> That said, how do we want to proceed next? I can post the >patches >> online and somebody else could test. Or I could just push to git >> and listen for screams of pain and anguish. No problems noticed >> here, but I'm only one person with my own perspective. >> >> Darrell > >Slavek, can you handle updating the Debian/Ubuntu packaging files >for this change? Am I supposed to push the patch set to git? Darrell