so then, the debug log on kcrash its correct, the "??" are on glibc true!

so then downgrade glibc6 to 2.12 or less, solved.

I will report (if not yet reported) to bugs list and then post as resolved.

thank s to all.

y also investigate the glibc6 problem by these stupid patch (alwais
redhat, always these guys do thinsk like windoze MS).. and post at my
blog www.qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:19 PM, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty@...> wrote:
> On 02/22/2011 11:41 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>> cc: arch-general
>>
>>   Arch devs - Do you think this could be a packaging/patch issue with Arch, or
>> do you think is going to be glibc itself? It looks like glibc to me, but I
>> thought I'd ask first before going to the glibc folks.
>>
>>
> We are homing in on the cause and a possible solution:
>
> <quote>
>
> glibc 2.13-4 introduced a patch from the Fedora glibc branch that is not
> included in mainline glibc and fixes issues with prelink [1]. Obviously, this
> has some side effects. Seems like it requires some more investigation.
>
> [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22656
>
> </quote>
>
>
> --
> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@...
> Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
> Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>
>



-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
Cofundador de Venenux;
http://shutendouji.net
creador de massenkoh linux.