trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: September 2013

Re: [trinity-devel] My opinion on Trinity project quality

From: Martin Graesslin <mgraesslin@...>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 19:36:33 +0200
On Saturday 14 September 2013 02:54:43 Fat-Zer wrote:
> I've got the same thoughts sometimes: to port kicker, kdesktop and keramik
> style to kde4 and there will be no need in trinity. I've even tried to
> start several times to port kicker and keramik... But all this have gone
> nowhere...
just for the record: kicker was already more or less ported to Qt4 at the time 
it got replaced by Plasma. It was in the source code till October 2007 [1], 
just a few months prior to the 4.0 release. So it would be a good idea 
starting from this point.

And I personally agree on that this would be a better approach for Trinity 
from a maintenance point of view as I have pointed out a few times in the past 
;-)

Cheers
Martin

[1] dcc7c9fc85524b5fb2b19e5c6755deb99f07f5e9 (http://commits.kde.org/kde-workspace/dcc7c9fc85524b5fb2b19e5c6755deb99f07f5e9 )

Attachments: