> On Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> > On Sunday 13 of October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> >> > Hello all, Tim,
>> >> >
>> >> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14 smooth update
>> was
>> >> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3. How should they be
>> >>
>> >> treated?
>> >>
>> >> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as conflicting
>> /
>> >> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade?
>> >>
>> >> We may need to rename the files, though this would push release back
>> yet
>> >> again.  My primary concern is the complaints we would get if we
>> blocked
>> >> installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts package field.
>> >>
>> >> At first glance the files listed are not used by the majority of TDE
>> >> applications, so renaming them might not be as bad as it first looks.
>> >> Let
>> >> me see what I can do with it.
>> >>
>> >> Tim
>> >
>> > I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts before
>> release
>> > RC1.
>> > Should I help?
>> >
>> > Slavek
>>
>> I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the majority of these
>> issues.  I don't know if the TDE sources will need to be updated
>> anywhere
>> to handle these changes; can you take a look?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Tim
>>
>
> I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree, and I did
> not
> find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.
>
> Slavek

So the Qt3/TQt3 conflicts are now sufficiently resolved for R14?

Tim