On Monday 02 of December 2013 23:49:31 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > On Monday 02 of December 2013 21:53:33 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 10 of November 2013 06:51:43 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> >> > On Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Sunday 13 of October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > Hello all, Tim,
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14 smooth
> >> >>
> >> >> update
> >> >>
> >> >> >> was
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3. How should they
> >>
> >> be
> >>
> >> >> >> >> treated?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as
> >> >>
> >> >> conflicting
> >> >>
> >> >> >> /
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> We may need to rename the files, though this would push release
> >> >>
> >> >> back
> >> >>
> >> >> >> yet
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> again.  My primary concern is the complaints we would get if we
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> blocked
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts package
> >> >>
> >> >> field.
> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> At first glance the files listed are not used by the majority
> >>
> >> of
> >>
> >> >> TDE
> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> applications, so renaming them might not be as bad as it first
> >> >>
> >> >> looks.
> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Let
> >> >> >> >> me see what I can do with it.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Tim
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts before
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> release
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > RC1.
> >> >> >> > Should I help?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Slavek
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the majority of
> >> >>
> >> >> these
> >> >>
> >> >> >> issues.  I don't know if the TDE sources will need to be updated
> >> >> >> anywhere
> >> >> >> to handle these changes; can you take a look?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Tim
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree, and I
> >> >>
> >> >> did
> >> >>
> >> >> > not
> >> >> > find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Slavek
> >> >>
> >> >> So the Qt3/TQt3 conflicts are now sufficiently resolved for R14?
> >> >>
> >> >> Tim
> >> >
> >> > Most of the conflicts were resolved, but still remain conflicts
> >> > qt3-apps-dev × tqt3-apps-dev:
> >> >
> >> > qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.a
> >> > qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.a
> >> > qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.a
> >> > qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.prl
> >> > qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.prl
> >> > qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.prl
> >>
> >> This should (finally!) be fixed in GIT.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >
> > Great, it looks good.
> >
> > By the way, just coincidentally I'm also test and solve problems with
> > upgrade
> > 3.5.13.x => R14 and also solve conflict of diverts kio-umountwrapper ×
> > tdeio-umountwrapper. Hovewer, because it seems to me wrong to deal with
> > diverts from foreign package, I have prepared a patch for the package
> > rename-meta => fix for metapackage kio-umountwrapper.
> >
> > Slavek
> > --
>
> Seems we were both working on the same thing then.  Feel free to reverse
> my commit to tde-packaging if you have a better solution. ;-)
>
> Tim
>
>

I assume that the user will either use a package kio-umountwrapper from 
rename-meta => divert solves this metapackage. Or will uninstall package 
kio-umountwrapper due to a conflict with tdeio-umountwrapper => diverts 
solves the original package during the uninstallation.

Before commit I'll test it in Ubuntu 13.10. It takes me a little time.
At this time I tested sucessfully on Debian 6.0.

Slavek