trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: January 2014

Re: [trinity-devel] R14 press information

From: "Darrell Anderson" <darrella@...>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:11:58 -0600
>Nevertheless I also think that before releasing R14 we *do* need 
>to make an effort to update website/wiki/documentation in general. 
>Otherwise all the good work gone into R14 will be mostly wasted by 
>poor first user impression.

My sentiments too. The current web site is functional --- no 
arguments from me. Yet a typical web user expects a little pizzazz 
from a web site.

I agree with the well tested adage that we have only chance to make 
a first impression. R14 is a big release. Let's update the web 
site. Let's release R14 the right way.

We don't have to get fancy. Just look around at other computer web 
sites. We don't have to engage in a major overhaul.  Find a 
template we like and reorganize the links. Add come color to the 
web site.

Long ago we had a discussion about updating the web site. I was 
asked to post recommendations. I don't remember whether the 
recommendations are in the dev mail list archives or an etherpad, 
but that would be a starting place.

The grand challenge of these types of discussions: who will step 
forward and start working on mockups? I don't have that kind of 
experience.

>If we want TDE to make a leap forward and be finally recognized as 
>a proper DE (and not as I read on several websites a "one man 
>show") we need to improve the public reception of TDE and updating 
>documentation and website are at the top of the list.

Fact: for a long while Trinity was a "one man show." Then I came 
along and became constant nuisance and PITA, continually asking for 
changes and patches to run Trinity on Slackware. Tim and I busted 
butt doing that. Slowly Trinity transformed into a universal 
desktop rather than a desktop that started as being fine-tuned for 
Kubuntu. We've come a long way since then.

That said, we not that far from still being a one man show. We have 
only three active developers. There are other people helping, but 
they c ome and go and only three people are continually knee deep 
in the mud.

Improving upon the "one man show" image is a good goal. Updating 
the web site will help.

>In the very worst case, once GIT code is R14 tagged, we should put 
>on hold development for a couple of weeks and focus on updating 
>documentation. Ideally though we should start earlier than that, 
>especially the handbooks.

The etherpad was updated long ago to include those tasks.

Darrell