On 01/28/2014 11:28 AM, Darrell Anderson wrote: > I always thought the answer is either. When tdebindings is built > and installed with libsmoke support, then libtqt-perl is not > supposed to build libsmoke. When tdebindings is not installed or > built without libsmoke support, then libtqt-perl is supposed to > build its own libsmoke. > > I always build tdebindings before libtqt-perl. Let's start with the last part first: > > But what do I know? --> A lot!, that's why we are renaming the 'trinity-devel' list to the 'darrell-anderson' list... Now on to the more pressing matter -- how to control: if libsmoke from A, then no libsmoke from B elif libsmoke from B, then no libsmoke from A fi Is this purely a packaging matter, of should there be some TDE logic that does this in the autotool/automake setup. Right now libtqt-perl is a prime example of the hell we will find ourselves in when automake 2 arrives. It does not build with automake 1.14 without significant hacks. Slavek has taken an initial patch of the problem and created an update to libtqt-perl and it looks like he has set libsmoke to build only in tdebinding. See: http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1875#c5 So that it the way we will go. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.