On 02/11/2014 01:12 PM, Darrell Anderson wrote:
> I don't know how we should audit the cmake conversion process. 
> Possibly one way is search the source tree in the known conversions 
> for Makefile.am and look for a coexisting CMakeLists.txt. That does 
> not mean the conversion is complete but would expose certain 
> incomplete conversions as I discovered last night in tdepim.
> 
> We need a way to audit cmake conversions. Any ideas?

Well, I did a cursory test ages ago just to get a handle on what had
CMakeLists.txt and what didn't. If we could identify solid criteria like you
suggested "directories with both CMakeLists and Makefile.am" files, then it
would be a simple process of walking the git tree with 'find' and identifying
apps which met the checks and those that partially met and those that were just
autofoo.

One issue I see is the use of .in.in and .in instead of .am, so we may need a
fairly broad search of the variants of Makefile.am, configure.blah to get a
valid picture of the state of the build setup.

I'll look for some tests, if you can think of others, let us know.

Everybody else as well.

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.