On 02/15/2014 02:58 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/15/2014 01:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 02/15/2014 01:40 PM, Darrell Anderson wrote:
>>> What am I supposed to do?
>>>
>>> We probably should grep the entire source tree for links, run a
>>> ping test, and note whether the test fails. The ping test would
>>> only prove whether the URL remains in existence but would not
>>> reveal whether the URL remains valid within context.
>>>
>>> Darrell
>>
>> Nothing,
>>
>> I'm grepping koffice where I think it lives. When I find it I'll patch it (if
>> I can) or tell you that you and Slavek will need to take a look.
>>
>
> Patch Available:
>
> http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/attachment.cgi?id=1931&action=diff
>
For those building koffice in the near future, please test the following patch:
cd koffice
patch -Np0 -i koffice-thesaurus-wordnet.diff
If it works, let's go ahead and push it. It does not effect anything in koffice
other than the error messages in kthesaurus that corrects the URL for the
WordNet sources.
Once confirmed and pushed close 1931.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Attachments: