On 4 March 2011 10:50, PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@...> wrote: > Kristofer, theres no posibvle that u said, please reaad about the 2 > previosly mail from me, i explaint some importante issues about kde licences > and GPL parts.. > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Kristopher Gamrat <pikidalto@...> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:16 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz >> <mckaygerhard@...> wrote: >> > Toqueror ???? >> > >> > O.o >> > >> > i dont think so >> > >> > maybe trinity for desktop name, and kfoo names change to qfoo, >> > referending >> > to QT backend based KDE libraries. >> > >> >> Quonqueror, Qonsole... >> >> Somehow these still don't sound right. If we use the T idea, I >> seriously doubt people would want to use amaroT. >> >> I still think if we rename them, we should at least pick something >> generic until we come up with a better name for rebranding, at least >> for the development versions in svn whilst we work on new names. Then >> we can rename stuff as we go along toward the rebranded stable >> release, concentrating mainly on the main stuff. >> >> I still like KDE Classic though. Perhaps we can see about doing a >> co-operative with the KDE4 devs? I'm not sure where the co-op would be >> (other than helping them "sanitize" their code and in adding in old >> features they still need (once we're strong in numbers and have a few >> more releases), but if they keep all their new "plasma" and such, I >> doubt the two projects would actually merge for a KDE5). >> >> -- >> Kris >> "Piki" >> Ark Linux Webmaster >> Trinity Desktop Environment Packager >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> trinity-devel-help@... >> Read list messsages on the Web archive: >> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ >> Please remember not to top-post: >> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >> > > > > -- > Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) > http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com > Cofundador de Venenux; > http://shutendouji.net > creador de massenkoh linux. > I haven't said anything on this thread until now, I was holding my judgement till both sides had been exposed. Frankly I think this is quite pointless and would be a bad thing. It would show that the Trinity project had no backbone, if we tried to "reconcile" or whatever with KDE (ignoring all the licensing issues or whatever) It would impede our efforts As for naming, Konsole isn't copyright, Konqueror isn't copyright, etc so we can keep the K scheme, it is familiar and easy. Internally we need to continue rebranding and seperating it. Eventually we should become fully seperate from the KDE naming scheme, but the manpower required to do so is insane Calvin Morrison