Dne st 26. února 2014 David C. Rankin napsal(a):
> On 02/26/2014 11:38 AM, Slávek Banko wrote:
> > As I noted in the bug report: This is not a problem. Presence code
> > for ConsoleKit has no effect unless ConsoleKit present on system.
> > With the ConsoleKit communicates via D-Bus. If ConsoleKit not
> > present, not with whom to communicate => code has no effect == same
> > as it was not used.
>
> The freedesktop.org documents say you MUST REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO
> CONSOLEKIT in order for systemd logind session tracking to work
> properly. I see your point, that if it has no effect --> it has no
> effect. My concern is that leaving "#define WITH_CONSOLE_KIT" hardcoded
> may be biting us.
>
> How hard is it to do a:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_CONSOLE_KIT
> #define WITH_CONSOLE_KIT
> #endif
>
> I also need a
>
> #ifdef HAVE_SYSTEMD
> #define WITH_SYSTEMD
> #endif
>
>
> Will including the check in ConfigureChecks.cmake accomplish this?
>
> if( BUILD_TDM )
>   pkg_search_module( SYSTEMD systemd )
>   if( NOT SYSTEMD_FOUND )
>     message( STATUS "*****  systemd NOT found on your system  *****" )
>   else( )
>     message( STATUS "*****  systemd FOUND on your system  *****" )
>     set ( HAVE_SYSTEMD 1)
>   endif( )
> endif( )
>
>
> Will this work? Will HAVE_SYSTEMD be seen in dm.h (or any other header)
> so it can be used as a preprocessor check?

Must remove is nice requirement, but when the code in reality without the 
presence of consolekit can not do anything, so it is quite the same as if 
there was not :)

-- 
Slavek