On Wednesday 15 of October 2014 17:39:06 Darrell wrote: > I appreciate the discussion about branching. I prefer a different view: no > branches. Just leave git as-is. Patches affecting post R14.0.0 are not > pushed to git. If inadvertently pushed, those patches are reverted until > post R14.0.0. Attach all post R14.0.0 patches to a respective bug report > with a note not to push until post R14.0.0. > > If uncertain during the freeze period, push privileges could be temporarily > suspended or limited to two people. > > The whole branching topic makes my head hurt. Based on the discussion I > suspect my head is not the only that spins. Planes circle airports waiting > to land because there is a limited number of usable runways. Use the same > analogy for pushing patches. Where is the rush? Especially considering how > long many Trinity patches tend to sit untouched in bug reports anyway. > > Regarding the three unfinished bug reports, just finish them. Again, where > is the rush? > > Darrell > I dare say that the work on v3.5.13-sru branch are obvious proof that it is not a good idea to consider option 1) do not use branches at all. -- Sl�vek