On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:10:41 -0500
"Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA224
> 
> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Visually, I have no problem with either using the provided false
> >> shadow or the CSS3 one. What it does
> >> >when it is displayed in Konq-error? Does it make Konq go crazy or it is
> >> just not shown.
> >>
> >> Konqueror just ignores the style instruction, because it's limited to
> >> CSS2.
> >> So the screenshot appears with no shadow (and a little bit of extra
> >> whitespace
> >> below it).  In other words, it's harmless and downgrades gracefully.
> >>
> >> E. Liddell
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well, it's okay for me to have the CSS3 shadow if it is harmless for
> > Konqueror. These little adjustments improves a lot the website and I think
> > that these changes are ready to go to production. What do you think?
> >
> > Thank you!
> > -Alexandre
> >
> 
> OK, let's go with the CSS3 shadow and get opinions from others on the list
> regarding this design.  If the consensus is that the new site is better
> then we'll put it into production.

There may be a problem with the stylesheet on screens where the main
text area is shorter than the sidebar.  I'm trying to figure out a fix.

E. Liddell