> > The sequence went something like this, IIRC:
> >
> > A few emails back, Alexandre asked that I underline the headers, because
> > he
> > didn't think they were sufficiently differentiated.
> >
> > I didn't want to underline them because I was afraid it would suggest that
> > the
> > other links weren't links, if you see what I mean, so I italicized them
> > instead.
> >
> > It was all mixed in with the discussion about the drop shadow.
> >
> > E. Liddell
>
> OK, thanks for the info. Alexandre, do you see a problem with making the
> headers non-underlined and non-italic? The color differences set them
> apart well enough for me.
>
> Also, while I haven't had time to evaluate a proper overhaul of the patch
> pages I have at least modified the backend so as to allow pagination.
> Patches are now available by default in 100-patch lists, starting with the
> newest. Everything else currently functions the same as before.
>
> E. Liddell, now that the patches page is a little easier to work with, can
> you send me an example of what the aforementioned css-driven table should
> look like? I can implement the changes quickly on this end.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim

Hi,

Even if I see well my colors, the color difference is not 100% evident to me, but with the italic text, it is more visible. Also, if the user is noodle enough to not know that it is a link, then too bad for him... But it is not such a big matter in the end...

Also, can you replace the TDE logo with a well resized one, to avoid blur?

Thank you!
-Alexandre