trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: December 2014

Re: [trinity-devel] web site minor improvments

From: Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:04:55 +0900
On 12/04/2014 11:53 AM, Michele Calgaro wrote:
> Tim,
> on the main website, there are a couple of things to improve IMO.
>
> 1) the link "Bugs" currently points to "https://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL" which will
> automatically load a long list of bugs resulting in a long loading time. It would be better if it simply pointed to
> "https://bugs.trinitydesktop.org" so the loading time would be shorter and the user could choose by him/herself what to
> look for.
>
> 2) in the mailing list page https://www.trinitydesktop.org/mailinglist.php, I think the "suggestions" about
> High/Moderate/Low traffic could be removed. For example the Dev ML has a higher traffic than the User ML, but the
> "suggestions" are saying the opposite.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
> Cheers
>    Michele
>

 >> I tried to get to see the whole bug list from the other link, and I find
 >> that it is not very simple to get there. I do not personally find bugzilla
 >> to be that intuitive or easy to use. So, even if it would make the loading
 >> time shorter, I am not sure that this one is and advantage.
 >
 >The issue you describe is exactly why the link was set up that way in the
 >first place.  It will remain as such.
 >
 >> For the second , it's true that the traffic info is not of much use,
 >> except to know if it will fill your inbox too fast.
 >
 >So deleting the traffic info lines is preferable to updating them with
 >correct information?  Just want to verify before updating the site.

It seems I am not getting some emails... the mail server must be playing some tricks :-(

Concerning the traffic info on the ML page, IMO they are not much useful. But if you prefer to just update the lines 
instead of deleting them, it's fine as well. Some other users may find them more useful than I do.

Cheers
   Michele