On 12/09/2014 02:53 AM, Sl�vek Banko wrote:
> Three months seemed like a good time. The good news is that builds for armel
> and armhf are now significantly faster. Tim recently announced a change in
> the mirror system. All this should speed up the process of releasing a new
> version. The question therefore is whether we will have enough capacity to
> fixing bugs. We can do this, we will assume that three months for release
> 14.0.1 and in the process we'll see if that's enough time.

Very good assessment Slavek, fully agree with you. Let's plan for 3 month release period, but if for any reason we are 
not able to fix a reasonable amount of bugs (let's say at least 20 or 30 bugs, other opinions are welcome) in that time, 
we should delay until we hit such minimum requirement.

Also, talking about v14.1.0 and v14.0.1, IMO we should slightly rearrange the meta bugs.
1) Bug 2233 should be renamed from "v14.0.1 official bug list (meta-bug)" to "v14.1.0 official bug list (meta-bug)" and 
would contain bugs to fix in the next release / improvement suggestions
2) We should add a new meta bug called "v14.0.1 resolved bug list". When we resolve a bug that will go into v14.0.1, we 
will link that bug to the meta bug. This meta bug will serve as a summary of all the fixes made for v14.0.1.

Later there will be a v14.0.2, v14.0.3... meta bugs, while bug 2233 will continue to serve as meta bug for the next 
minor release.

What do you think? If you agree, I can do the changes required.

Cheers
   Michele