-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 > On Wednesday 10 of December 2014 05:00:20 Timothy Pearson wrote: >> > On 2014/12/09 01:27 PM, Sl�vek Banko wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 09 of December 2014 04:46:34 Michele Calgaro wrote: >> >>> Tim, Slavek, >> >>> over the weekend I did a full TDE rebuild in Jessie. >> >>> The only two packages to fail were >> compiz-fusion-plugins-main-trinity >> >>> and >> >>> compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-trinity, due to a missing depencency for >> >>> libjpeg62-dev. >> >>> The attached 'control' files fix the problem for both of them. Just >> >>> rename >> >>> the files back to 'control'. >> >>> >> >>> Cheers >> >>> Michele >> >> >> >> I believe that it is better to use a general dependence libjpeg-dev. >> >> What do you think? >> > >> > That's probably better. Both libjpeg62-dev and libjpeg62-turbo-dev >> > provides libjpeg-dev. I didn't try building using only a dependency on >> > libjpeg-dev, but if there is no FTBFS in any distro, I would go for >> it. >> > >> > Cheers >> > Michele >> >> Slavek, do you want to handle this by building on your PPA and I'll copy >> to the main archive once the builds are complete? >> >> For R14.0.1 I will look into moving some of these older -deps packages >> into the main GIT repositories. >> >> Tim >> > > For a moment, all updated packages will be ready to copy: > https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/~slavek-banko/+archive/ubuntu/deps-r14/+copy-packages?field.name_filter=compiz-fusion-plugins&field.include_binaries=COPY_BINARIES&batch=50 Thanks; copied. > Here I would saw the question, what packages are useful and what packages > we > really want to maintain. For example, for such Compiz I'd rather doubted > if > we want it. Not sure; if it still compiles why not? > Some dependencies I consider to be temporary - such as lcms1, libept, > libapt-front. Correct. These should not be included in GIT. > Some dependencies are definite candidates for inclusion into the GIT - for > example libr. Correct again. The fact that libr was not already in GIT was actually a fairly serious oversight on my part; this will be fixed for our next SRU. Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAlSKi60ACgkQLaxZSoRZrGF+fwDeJpxe7ozKOV3zYhGl1Wz5atjO kr+UKryfqvankADgl1BRRyWH7ELEB9fhJAViY238kdI6UgTtZYHmEA== =Qmmj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----