On 20/12/2015 17:29, Michael Howard wrote: > On 20/12/2015 17:11, Sl�vek Banko wrote: >> On Sunday 20 of December 2015 17:28:48 Michael Howard wrote: >>> 1. On debian jessie, after building, 'aptitude install tde-trinity' >>> complains with; >>> >>> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >>> kitchensync-trinity : Depends: libopensync0 (>= 0.22) which is a >>> virtual package. >>> The following actions will resolve these dependencies: >>> >>> Keep the following packages at their current version: >>> 1) kitchensync-trinity [Not Installed] >>> 2) tde-trinity [Not Installed] >>> 3) tdepim-trinity [Not Installed] >>> >>> but, libopensync0 isn't available in jessie. Obviously, the packages >>> build because Slavek's repo was in the sources.list. So, what gives? It >>> shouldn't need Slavek's repo in the sources.list to install TDE >>> should it? >> libopensync0 is available in extra build dependencies repository - see >> https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/~slavek-banko/+archive/ubuntu/deps-r14 >> >> >> These dependencies are available in the official repositories - see >> http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-builddeps-r14.0.0/ubuntu >> >> http://mirror.ppa.trinitydesktop.org/trinity/trinity-nightly-build-dependencies/ubuntu >> >> >> As apt source can be used also preliminary stable builds repository: >> deb http://mirror.xcer.cz/trinity-sb wheezy deps-r14 >> > Thanks for the reply. > > Yes, I know the build dependencies are available, that's how I built > the packages :) > > What I was wondering is why, having built all the packages (in a > chroot) that I could not _install_ 'tde-trinity ' unless I had a build > dependency repo in my sources.list. That should not be necessary, surely? > Apologies for following myself up but, having checked the 'Packages' file again, 'kitchensync-trinity' does indeed depend on 'libopensync0 (>= 0.22)' which begs the question, how does one install 'tde-trinity' on a clean jessie (which I assume people have done?) when 'libopensync0' is not available in jessie? Without fiddling that is. Or, am I being a bit thick? :) Mike. --