On 03/07/2016 07:33 AM, E. Liddell wrote: > I'd say give it a couple more weeks, then call a vote (with "keep the existing > logo" as one of the choices, just in case it has overwhelming support) to thin > the ranks. Then approach Tim with the top ~3 if he hasn't weighed in yet > at that point--ultimately, he has veto rights. That is a good idea. +1 Cheers Michele