trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: March 2016

Re: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS

From: Fat-Zer <fatzer2@...>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:53:10 +0300
2016-03-28 16:59 GMT+03:00 Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...>:
>
> Ok, I can reproduce the exact same FTBFS in my system as well when I use "-fkeep-inline-functions".
> Question: based on your experience, do you think it is worth spending time to look and fix this kind of problems across
> all TDE code? I am thinking in terms of time required vs. benefit.

Short answer: No.
A bit longer answer: There won't likely be a lot of such issues, most
of them supposed to be in tedlibs, but those in tdelibs may be tricky
to fix and also their fixing may require to break the API. The
benefits are quite little: a bit more code clearance... So IMHO it's
priority is much lower than e.g. fixing those tones of warnings which
are present even on the default level...

Sorry I've reported the issue before I get into it.. So it came to a
big noise with mostly no reason...