trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: December 2016

Re: [trinity-devel] Re: moc and dbus related question

From: Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:24:44 +0900
On 2016/12/06 04:56 PM, Sl�vek Banko wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 of December 2016 08:50:47 deloptes wrote:
>> Michele Calgaro wrote:
>>> moc files are created by tqmake before the actual compilation. You
>>> need to add the the Q_OBJECT "declaration" inside a class to get the
>>> moc file generated. See here for more info:
>>> https://www.trinitydesktop.org/docs/qt3/object.html Cheers
>>> Michele
>>
>> Thanks Michele,
>> I was thinking that TQ_OBJECT is the correct one for TDE, at least
>> compiler did not complain.
>> I also think that whole dbus should be moved to dbus-1-tqt, what is
>> your opinion? ATM the classes in kbluetooth are wrappers around dbus.
>> Also what are the plans for supporting gdbus? I discussed time ago with
>> SyncEvolution and they stated gdbus is the preferred one?
>> I'm just asking, so that what I do holds for the future.
>>
>> Thanks and regards
>>
> 
> In connection with this you might find useful:
> 
>   http://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2673
> 

See the bug indicated by Slavek for more info about TQ_OBJECT/Q_OBJECT.

Regarding gdubs, I think (and I am quite sure I already sent some email to your previous question some months ago) it
would be hard to move to gdbus since this originated from the gnome world.
Of course final decision is up to Tim, but I would be surprise if he decides to ditch dbus-tqt for gdbus.

Cheers
  Michele


Attachments: