On 03/17/2011 09:59 PM, Katheryne Draven wrote:
> On 3/17/11, calvin morrison<mutantturkey@...>  wrote:
>> On 17 March 2011 15:23, Darrell Anderson<humanreadable@...>  wrote:
>>> I think for the immediate future (2+ years or so?) that Trinity should not
>>> get fancy with logos or cuteness.
>>>
>>> Tim has already modified the traditional KDE3 logos and substituted the K
>>> with a T. That provides acknowledgment of roots distinguishes Trinity from
>>> KDE3. Simple and straightforward.
>>>
>>> In two to three years, if Trinity is alive and well, then perhaps a new
>>> logo should be considered.
>>>
>>> Darrell
>>>
>>>
>> I think that brainstorming now cannot hurt. I also think that we do
>> need to look into working on themes, logos, websites all that jazz.
>> instead of being stuck with some crappy old logo, maybe it would be
>> good to have a new one. People see fresh logo, (even if it the same
>> concept of the T) and a new theme, as well as anything else on .13 or
>> after, they will also assume we are making improvements elsewere.
>>
>> take windows for example, its been getting progressively worse since
>> XP, yet each time no one notices because they keep making it move
>> attractive.
>>
>> Just my thoughts
>>
>> Calvin Morrison
>>
> I completely agree, it couldn't hurt.
>
> Kate

I don'tknow it _always_ hurts me to think ;)