> Yes.  It is used by libkcal though; it is a
> replacement for the old
> internal version of libical.  Trust me; it's much
> better this way--the old
> integrated libical had many bugs, including random changing
> of Korganizer
> appointment times.

Shouldn't libical then be in the dependencies section of svn?

> Look for the .tar.gz file--it is in that list somewhere.

I'm still unclear -- are those two packages required or optional for building kdepim? If they are required, then like libical, shouldn't they be in svn/dependencies?

> Yes it would.  However, security certificates cost
> money.  Lots of it. 
> Unless someone would like to donate a site-wide certificate
> for
> *.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net, I don't think that will
> change. ;-)

I just dislike the way Firefox does not allow the option to accept the certificate. Yet Another Example of Arrogant Developers.