trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: July 2011

Re: [trinity-devel] A users perspective on Trinity

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:10:53 -0500
> the mail cited by tim,
>

While we are on that topic I should mention that I consider many of the
original "suggestions" in the message I forwarded to be nits, if not just
plain ridiculous.  I forwarded the message to this list to make sure that
I was not alone, and to see what people's thoughts on the matter were.

To clear up some things:
* koffice cannot be built in pieces, but there is no reason to drop it at
this time.  It will stay in the TDE distribution tarball for the
forseeable future, and *may* even pick up some enhancements along the way
if ioslaves from Calligra can be backported to TQt easily enough.
* The extent of the renaming for the 3.5.13 release would be core
libraries and non-user-visible strings.  This would be done only to make
downstream packaging easier (i.e. rename libkdecore.so to libtdecore.so,
etc.).  User visible strings / application names will probably never
change, except the KDE->TDE string replacement that has already occurred.

Tim