Message: previous - next
Month: July 2011

Re: [trinity-devel] A users perspective on Trinity

From: PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@...>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:02:54 -0430
Ilya, the fact is that by causality/coincidence the project trinity
and some rpm windows-like distributions use the same "prefix" (/opt
/opt/kde3 in redhat or suse), and therefore, by any
causality/coincidence have a match/compatibility, but trinity never
was compatible with applications preinstalled or precompiled unless
rebuild against trinity desktop/libs.

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Ilya Chernykh <anixxsus@...> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 July 2011 22:10:53 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> * The extent of the renaming for the 3.5.13 release would be core
>> libraries and non-user-visible strings. �This would be done only to make
>> downstream packaging easier (i.e. rename to,
>> etc.).
> Sorry, but what the purpose in renaming the library files?
> This will break the binary compatibility and also dependencies on rpm-based systems.
> I would like to see Trinity and old KDE3 applications as much compatible as possible
> so one can choose either trinity's or kde3's core and have his old apps still working.
> For this reason we have even KDE3 in KDE:KDE3 repository building against a Trinity-patched
> Qt3 so that the both could use the same Qt3 package.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@...
> Read list messsages on the Web archive:
> Please remember not to top-post:

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
Cofundador de Venenux;� debian based multimedia alike free only
zealots users (oh well, i try but..too many free guidelines buahhh)
creador de massenkoh linux; debian enhanchements for better up to date
support on stable brand, including non-free soft.